Wednesday, September 24, 2008

When a Business Owner is the Problem

Businesses are run by leaders. We often hear people saying person is a born leader or person if not an effectual leader. It is true that some of us are born with leading qualities. But you can also inculcate leading qualities by practicing them. The leading schools and courses of study are just doing that. The procedure of improvement sets in when you recognize and accept your weaknesses. If you go on to dwell in a fool's eden nil on this Earth can travel you. There are certain properties which a leader should possess.

A good leader should be able to pass on his or her thoughts, feelings and vision to the followers. Leader should be able to actuate people by communicating his mind. Vision is of extreme importance. A leader have to be visionary. Leader should be in place to anticipate the hereafter and then work for achieving the goals. Vision only assist in creating a single minded approach. Clear vision is trademark of a good leader. Another of import property that a leader should have got is honesty. Leader's actions should have got transparency. Following should see openness in his or deeds. Single minded chase or dedication to accomplish the marks is another of import quality. It may not so go on that leader may be forcing subsidiaries to work difficult while at the same clip screening apathetic mental attitude towards their problems.

Creativity is another of import virtue. A originative head believes differently. Leadership often may have got to look for out of box solutions to the problems. With originative head at their disposal they can rattle out any figure of solutions to turn to the issue. Aggression and self-assertiveness are two different things. Assertiveness points to the ability to of a leader to explicate what his or her outlooks are. Munificence and unimportance are other of import property which do a leader, a leader. And last but not the least, the 1 of the other of import property of a leader is to express joy over 1s ain self. Good wit as an property is always desired and respected. Organization is always on lookout man for good leaders. But it is a panic commodity. Sometimes we speak of leading styles. Every other leader have its ain style. Style is not the concluding word but effectivity is. Organizations many a modern times land themselves in to jobs when leadership are forced upon them. Such leading are hardly accepted.

Ineffective leadership - symptoms and signs

Dwindling marketplace share: the figs and statistics begin indicating that marketplace share in their sphere of trading operations is going down. A down marketplace share makes propose that organisation have got not been able to maintain gait with the changing modern times and gross sales have suffered. This status proposes that the leader have not been able to anticipate the alterations taking topographic point in the marketplace environment. In other words leader misses vision. Indiscipline and in subordination: when the figure of cases of insubordination and undiscipline additions in an organisation then this simply intends that leader or the caput is not asserting himself. In other words leader is lacking the self-assertiveness trait. High turnover rate of employees: when a very high per centum of employees begin leaving the organisation then it reflects poorly on its leader because as a caput of household he or she have not been able to turn to grudges of the employees. This proposes that leading is lacking probably in figure of attributes. Communication, openness etc may have got been missing. It again talks poorly on vision property of leader. A illusionist leader would never let the state of affairs to intensify to this point.

What can be done to wiggle organisation out from such as situation?

Assessment: assessing and realizing your short approaches is the first measure in any course of study rectification process. Find out the ground for failures. Expose leading to assorted preparation faculties which assist in edifice leading attributes. This tin not be done overnight. It is a gradual and slow procedure and demands to be carried out on continual basis. Form informal interactions where employees can air out their grievances. Empower and delegate your work. Try to split the duties amongst undertaking leadership and monitoring devices them. If nil assists then travel in for change. Appoint new leader and give him or her clear targets. Leadership is a accomplishment and can be honed with proper training. It is often said there are three ways through which a leader can rock masses. First is by example, 2nd is by illustration and 3rd also is by example. Actions make talk louder than words.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, September 08, 2008

Leadership Exists at All Levels of the Organization

When we believe of leadership, many modern times we immediately believe about senior and executive director degree managers. Although this is true, leading bes at many degrees below the senior one. First of all, you should analyze your functional degrees for emerging and existent leaders. This agency that the very last degrees of your organisation will turn leadership - and you must look for them there. A functional leader is person with a great trade of cognition in a functional area, such as as assembly lines or depository financial institution cogent evidence operators. The difference is that the functional leader utilizes that cognition to authorise others, work out problems, and develop his or her career. You may happen that these functional leading even exhibit more than of a leading function than their direct supervisors - and it's up to you to make up one's mind what to make with them.

You can also look for leadership in the center supervisory or direction areas, as well as the functional supervisors. Many modern times our disposition is to go forth this grouping out - they are productive, happy, and acquire good feedback from the people who study to them. Therefore we believe that they've achieved their calling ends - but believe again. You'll happen that these center direction leadership are solving problems, championing your vision without being asked, and taking the clip to actuate and animate their workers. These leading can be ready for promotion - and advanced leadership training. Take the clip to seek them out. Obviously your senior and executive director direction squads are full of leading - but it's calm your duty to maintain them motivated, inspired, and in a leadership stance. In fact, it may be that this grouping is your greatest challenge - you've got to happen a manner to maintain these leadership motivated even though they may have got reached a staying point in their calling with the organization.

So if you've identified these assorted degrees of leaders, what can you make to develop, motivate, and reserve them? At the functional levels, you should always offer further functional training, whether it's in the same country of expertness or across functions. See adding direction and leading courses of study within the function. For example, if you've got emerging leadership on the assembly line, develop courses of study that learn these leadership how to manager and actuate within the assembly line environment, using specific illustrations and scenarios from that area. The center direction and supervisory countries are the best topographic points to get leading development in earnest. Offer direction and leading courses of study and seminars for anyone in these functions or anyone who is aspirant to or recommended for these roles.

These acquisition intercessions include coaching, human resources management, and leadership. Open these courses of study and intercessions up to the functional leadership at assorted times, as well. In fact, you may desire to see using a leading appraisal tool to turn out the leading aptitude at the functional degrees - and unfastened the leading development programme to those individuals. This degree of development motivates the functional and center degree leadership to go on working difficult and developing their skills. At the executive director or senior level, leading development should take on a much more than "intense" tone. For example, leadership could experience intense squad building, such as as ropes courses of study or endurance type intercessions to solidify the team. Or, leadership at this degree can be placed into work groupings to work out existent organizational jobs and Pb the undertaking teams. Development at this degree should be real-time and usage existent jobs - and you can estimate the leaders' abilities in numerous competencies. This isn't necessarily something you or your preparation section should undertake alone - there are numerous advisers and houses that tin aid you with leading development at the senior levels.

Now that we've discovered where leading bes and how to develop it, let's speak about why you should take the clip and money to make it. First of all, you're creating a civilization of leadership. In fact, this could be one of your values - the 1s you desire to go through into the organization's culture. By identifying leadership and developing them, you're showing that the organisation is dedicated to maintaining leadership - and determination new 1s at all levels. Not only this, you're extending your civilization of development. Your organisation may offer preparation of many kinds, but adding leading development shows a high committedness to excellence.

Any clip you put in leading development, it gives you the chance to make and keep a endowment pool. You'll be amazed at how your leadership respond to their development - and how you get to set together the puzzler pieces related to endowment direction and sequence planning. As development grows, you'll have got a changeless endowment pool - and the ability to rest easy knowing that your leading needs, planned or unplanned, are already met. Finally, and most importantly, identifying and developing leadership at all degrees makes and keeps a degree of motivation. You've taken the clip to sketch the competences you look for in leaders, so aspirant leadership have got a manner to grow. They will endeavor for acknowledgment as leadership - and animate their direct studies to make so, as well. And the fact that you acknowledge leadership at all degrees will animate a motive that's difficult to achieve.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, September 06, 2008

Leadership Is Not a Rare Skill

Let's expression at some of the common accomplishments and properties a leader should have. First of all, leadership should have got the ability to leave information. This doesn't look very hard, but conceive of how many leadership prefer to "sit" on information instead of disseminating it to the organization. A leader must have got a natural ability to share, teach, and manager while imparting information. Leadership must have got an innate apprehension of "big picture" necessitates - he or she must be able to make up one's mind what is good for the organisation as a whole and move forward. The manner to guarantee that people see the large image is by imparting information as we've already discussed.

As a leader, you should also have got the ability to put an example, either by word or feat - or both. Rich Person you ever heard a leader usage the phrase, "do as I say, not as I do"? This should never be in the vocabulary of a true leader. Leadership should be expert at job solving. This is a trait that be givens to frighten people, but retrieve that you don't have got to be a job problem solver in all areas. Also, retrieve that job solving could be the amplification of a vision that works out a current problem. Leadership should be able to measure and analyse organizations, problems, solutions, and other people. Often this come ups simply from experience - and from watching another leader make the same thing. These accomplishments are not out of the ordinary accomplishments - and we all have got the possible to sharpen them.

In improver to skills, what actions should leadership take? First, leadership should set up a vision. Most of us have got the ability to daydream, to believe about the "what if's" inch every situation. Why not utilize this accomplishment at the organizational level? Brainstorming a vision doesn't have got to give a hit each clip - you can begin with highly ingenious visions and work your manner down. The point is, we all have got the ability to visualize the hereafter - and we should utilize this ability every day. Leadership must actuate the organisation and those around them. Motivation come ups from encouragement, the acceptance of failure, and the recognition of occupations well done. Motivation is not a rare skill, either. You must drill it and make an environment that booms on it. With motive come ups inspiration. When we believe of person who is inspirational, we may believe about those super-great leaders like Churchill, but inspiration can come up about through non-charismatic means. For example, if you are leading by example, let's state as a technical innovator, then people will be inspired when they see your work. Simply by acknowledging others, you can make inspiration. Again, these are not hard skills.

We've already talked about sharing cognition as a leading skill, but let's look at it in another way. When you leave knowledge, you can take on the stance of a wise leader, person who is willing to give advice and base out of the manner to watch things happen. Finally, leadership must title-holder their ain vision. This agency that you must believe in your vision, believe in the organization's ability to accomplish the vision, and constantly promote people to maintain going. All of these leading actions are not extraordinary - but they make take a high degree of self-awareness.

Self-awareness is one of the "hows" in leadership. But being self-aware is also not an extraordinary or unusual skill. To go self-aware, you should always concentrate on how others comprehend you - and not on how you comprehend yourself. You must be willing to accept unfavorable judgment and work with it in order to turn it into something positive. What are some other ways to develop the accomplishments and actions of a leader?

Open communicating is a cardinal factor. As a leader, you must pass on honestly with all degrees of the organisation - that's usually the easy portion of communication. But on the other hand, you must promote unfastened communicating with you, which can be difficult. In fact, if you're not willing to hear from others about the organization's issues, your leading will fail. It's that simple. Visibility is another manner to develop your leading potential. Be seeable to your organisation - some leading look to boom in an tusk tower, having other members of the leadership squad take attention of the good and bad issues. To take by example, to promote communication, and to motivate, you must keep your ain visibility. Finally, you must make an environment that conveys out the possible of others - through development. Always be willing to supply functional, supervisory, and leading development to all degrees of your organization. Development also lies in holding unfastened forums or "town hall" meetings to be visible, reply questions, and inquire inquiries of the organization.

So is leading a rare skill? Absolutely not. We all have got got the possible to be leadership and some of us have the possible to be among the great leaders. The difference in being a leader and not being a leader is the amount of dedication we set into developing ourselves - and developing others. When you make a motivational, inspirational, and illusionist environment, you are sharpening your ain leading skills. The best portion is that you are also enabling the development of the accomplishments and possible of others.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, September 04, 2008

What Is Your Leadership Style?

Leadership takes many forms, but there are three styles of leading that are the most prevalent. Good leadership make not take one word form and lodge to it - they look for the right states of affairs for each style. However, good leadership make cognize what their dominant style is and capitalise on the benefits of that style. Let's expression at the three leading styles, and the possible pitfalls of each. Think about which style is yours - and how you can modify it in assorted situations.

Autocratic leading is also referred to as autocratic leadership. In this style, the leader normally sketches what he or she desires and how this is to be achieved. In many ways, autocratical leading isn't leading at all but a word form of martinet management. Are there states of affairs where this style is effective? First of all, expression at the organization. If the organisation is well motivated and mature, an autocratical state of affairs may be effective. Let's say you have got most of the information you necessitate but the clip to accomplish a certain end is very short. In a well-motivated organization, you can probably give an autocratical order and not be concerned about how it will be taken - as long as this makes not go your dominant style. If you are a consistent autocratical leader, you're probably not getting a good response from your organization. One of the pitfalls of autocratical leading is the possibility of falling into an insulting or humbling form - this is why you should only utilize an autocratical stance in rare states of affairs and certainly not regularly. If you place with a dominant autocratical style, see transitioning into a more than participative style of leadership.

Participative or democratic leading is a style in which the leader still sketches a end but lets some input signal from the organisation as far as how the end will be achieved. But a democratic leader still do it necessary to obtain blessing for determinations by any member of the team. In states of affairs where information is distribute out between the leader and the squad members, a democratic style may work. This style can also be an appropriate manner for an autocratical leader to passage out of that style - without giving entire control to the team. This leading style is very empowering to squads that have got not felt empowered before. It's also a great manner to prove the cognition and ability of a squad before transitioning into a much less controlling leading style. Because this leading style is basically one measure up from autocracy, it may be easy for a leader to fall back into an autocratic stance. If the squad neglects or falls short, democratic leading lets them to re-formulate plans and activities - without telling them exactly what to do.

The third, and most empowering word form of leading is the laissez-faire or delegative style. The delegative leader sets an overall priority, goal, or instruction, but then stand ups out of the manner to allow things happen. Using this style, a leader takes duty for all determinations that are made - but go forths the determination devising to the team. This also intends that squad members are expected to analyze, evaluate, and alteration issues and jobs as they travel along. This style of leading is definitely appropriate with mature or more than senior squads - the 1s who have got got had the clip to turn out themselves to the leader and have the assurance to manage all issues. One of the greatest pitfalls of this type of leading affects failure. If something travels wrong, this is not the topographic point for a leader to fault the squad - and this is more than than likely a natural reaction for a laissez-faire leader.

Now that we've seen the three dominant leading styles, which one are you? Remember that the grade of a good leader is the ability to utilize assorted styles depending on the state of affairs - a bad leader lodges with the same style at all times. So what are some of the states of affairs where each style is appropriate? If you have got a new team, you may desire to utilize the autocratical style as a agency of assessing the grouping and its members. But what if you are placed in a place where most of the squads cognize their undertakings well and would not respond well to an autocratical stance? Use a participative style in this state of affairs - let the squads to have got input signal in the determination devising process. Remember that you can authorise yourself as a leader as well as a squad using this style. Finally, what if your squad members cognize more than about the state of affairs than you do? Take a delegative attack and allow the squads do their ain decisions, all the piece reminding them that you will be responsible for the outcomes.

When you're deciding what leading style to take, there are a few things to consider. First of all, how much clip make you have? If you're very limited in time, participative or autocratical may be the best style. Of course, this also depends on the squad and its constitution - if you have got an experienced squad and limited time, there is no demand to utilize an autocratical stance. Simply explicate and stress that clip is limited. You should also take into business relationship who have the information related to the undertaking or undertaking at manus - if information is divided amongst you, the leader, and the team, you may desire to take a participative stance. If your squad have all of the information, take a delegative stance - allow them utilize their information to come up up with the best solutions. Also see the type of undertaking you're looking at - how complicated is it? Compare this with the accomplishment of the squad and you should be able to take an appropriate leading style.

If your dominant style is more than autocratic, you may desire to analyze what's keeping you from moving into a participative stance. If you are one of the other two types, you're probably getting a good response from your teams. Just retrieve to change your leading style based on states of affairs - and don't lodge to one style regardless. When you get to travel around the different styles, you'll happen that your squads will respond.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Leadership - The Untold Magic of Encouraging Others

There are many articles and books that define leading and quality traits of leaders. Leadership in respective Fields or walks of life are recognized for being powerful, influential, charismatic, visionary, adept and also encouraging. Words throw a very strong influence whether positively or negatively on people. A leader can utilize their words to inspire, heighten and promote a grouping to immeasurable success. Listed below are ways, that you as a leader can positively act upon your group, association or squad to a degree of unprecedented success!

#1 Words can determine a way for the future.

As leaders, it is indispensable to recognize that the words you talk clasp a batch of powerfulness and can construct or interruption your team, grouping or association. The things you state can determine the way that you lead. Being positive, end oriented and staying focused are all exceeding ways of creating success on a project, undertaking or finishing an agenda. Leadership are urged to utilize their words to advance a way of success and triumphs instead of division, fearfulness or strife.

#2 Words can advance diverseness and change.

Your words can also advance an grasp of diverseness and promote a healthy agency of alteration within your group, association or team. The leader is the caput and can use their words to make integrity and help with the trials and procedures of alteration that could destruct a group, mission/vision Oregon project. They can adept show diplomatic negotiations and professionalism in their words and mental attitudes towards diverseness and alteration which can affect and mobilise their team.

#3 Words can develop un-utilized skills.

Leaders can utilize their words to develop their group, association or team. An inspiring or encouraging word can increase the consciousness of limitless abilities, accomplishments and resource people. Possibility is a strong thought and if people believe that they are under the right leadership, they will increase their desires and ends for success and meeting their ends and objectives.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, February 29, 2008

Are You a Strategic Leader?

Aren't all leadership strategic? Isn't being strategical a requirement for being identified as a leader?

I have got got coached 100s of leaders; those who have been terminated (right-sized, downsized or fired) and those who are seeking to heighten their leading prowess. After working with this big volume of executive director clients, I am able to fairly easily place those leading who have got got got got an innate strategical constituent as portion of their leadership makeup, those that have acquired a certain accomplishment degree and those who speak about scheme - but don't have a hint as to how to be a strategical leader.

What are the differences?

Those leadership who have a true strategical attack and intent see the complexness and the simpleness (yin and yang) in all problems, opportunities, challenges and threats. They see all the disparate "dots" - and they can link them. They encompass the large image and they are able to see and enactment on the interrelatednesses between fundamentally differing elements.

The other two groupings of leaders: those who have got acquired accomplishments in asking discovery questions, reading the indexes and capitalizing on tendencies and those who speak about scheme but are mired in tactics - can larn the dogmas of strategy, but they never acquire the degree of omniscience and precognition that true strategical leadership naturally exhibit.

Another observation about strategical leadership - they also get fired! Their strategical leading endowment makes not do them immune to the caprices of corporate reality. For any figure of reasons, they often happen themselves in an unwanted transition. But through conversations with them, I happen that they all proverb it coming 18 calendar months to two old age before the existent event. Some tested to turn the tide; others saw the inevitableness and took stairway to get to place their adjacent opportunities. Most often, they were fired because they were the announce of troubled modern times to come up or they opposed popular determinations that they knew would not profit the corporation.

Are you a strategical leader?

Labels: , ,

Monday, February 18, 2008

A Inspiring Leadership People Hardly Heard Of

I got to read and experience 1 of the most inspiring and low leading from Rich DeVos. Out of all the books and seminars about leadership, I pattern his leading and would wish to share my experience with everyone.

He was the co-founder of Amway. Some of you might be disbelieving of Amway. But make you cognize in 2006, Forbes magazine listed him as the 73rd wealthiest individual in the United States with an estimation network worth of USD $ 3.5 billion. The direct merchandising company now runs in more than than than 80 states and districts around the world, and enables more than 3 million people to have independent businesses.

So, what sort of leading lets him to take billions of man of affairs to make a immense direct merchandising empire?

He used 'A Servant's Heart' to depict leadership. Leadership are not accountant or dictator, they are people who function others. Leadership function their teams. They function them by:

1. Support and Promote The Team Come Out Great And Exciting Goals.

Most leadership are only concerned about their ain goal. They seek to utilize the squad for his ain benefit and accomplish things he/she want. Leadership concern about their squad and support them to acquire a clear and specific end for their own.

2. Assign Undertaking And Work They Desire To Take On

Don't delegate undertaking according to their strength or what you believe it's outdo for them. Let them to take the undertaking and work they desire to do. They might desire to better themselves or acquire inspired to take on another task. This lets everyone who are in the squad fulfilled and happy as a team.

3. Motivate And Empower Everyone At All Time

When everyone is working hard, he is always around them to see what the squad need. They are there to see what the squad necessitates to transport their undertakings effectively and accomplish what they want. They promote them and congratulations them for what the squad have achieved.

4. Show Them What Limits Them From Achieving What They Want

When individual in the squad fails, the leader will not rebuke or penalize that person. He/she inquire what go on and how that individual can better and larn from the mistake. That individual experiences empowered and cared. He/she mightiness work more than effectively and never reiterate that error again.

5. Appreciate Their Contribution And Promote Them To Take On In Future

If person have contributed great consequences to the team, the leader will always be there to praise and appreciate his/her attempt and purpose to the team. The leader will promote him to make that again in future. By doing these, that individual is empowered and willing to do another miracle again.

6. Make Sure Everyone Enjoy!

The leader do certain everyone bask the journeying and the consequences for being in the team. He/she never bury to make fun, felicity and positive motive to everyone.

This is the prima Rich DeVos utilizes to success in his leading and I utilize it for my ain business.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

Self-Confidence To Be A Leader

There are multiple traits, characteristics, skills, and abilities that you should develop to discover your leadership. There are many ways to travel about this growing process. But whatever method you use, you should first take care of yourself. In other words, you should lead yourself before you lead others.

How make you lead yourself? Well, the most sensible manner to get on the right path is to 'put your house in order'. Simply experience good about yourself. Feel confident about your abilities. Convert yourself that you have got the capacity to lead, and that you ought to be a leader. It is only with self-confidence that you will be able to supply a foundation for your followers. Leaders are supposed to supply stableness to followers; perhaps a stableness that those followers don't have. Many are counting on their leaders to ease that foundation that they haven't been able to make for themselves. So if the leader doesn't have got that strong foundation, it is impossible to transmit it to anyone else. Perhaps you're a good histrion and attract a following at first, by making people believe that you make have got self-confidence. But that edifice without a foundation will soon crumble.

The residual of this station will concentrate on some tactics that you should set into pattern if you desire to be self-confident:

* Fit a end or purpose- If you don't cognize what you want, you will never have got self-confidence. Self-confidence is all about believing that you are capable of achieving something. But you have got got to cognize what that something is. If you don't, then you have nil to be confident about! First lineation a strong purpose, a 'North Star' that you can look towards so you cognize where you're headed. This may be as simple (but supremely important) as raising a loving household or as complex as changing the manner the world communicates. Nevertheless, it should have got some specificity to it, so that you can direct your energy and efforts. Bill Bill Gates didn't just state "My end is to change the world", but "I desire every household to have got a personal computer." That certainly changed the world, but in a much more than targeted way.

* Prepare- Simply, you should cognize what you're talking about. Knowing that you predominate your country will give you the feeling that you have got the powerfulness to speak authoritatively about anything that affects your range of influence. Now, I'm not saying you can learn everything there is to know, since you should always endeavor to cognize more than than the twenty-four hours before. But if you get to a point where you can reasonably state that you predominate your field more than most people, you will have got the right to see yourself an authority. You will have got the right to be certain that whatever you state is correct. Now that is self-confidence!

* Practice- Your have multiple Scopes of influence. You act upon your family, your classmates, your work buddies, your students, your mentors, your bosses, and even complete strangers that you ran into in the street. In other words, you have got many chances to develop your leadership skills. Practice by cheering up a work companion. Propose a cost-cutting procedure at work. Get involved in baseball clubs and invent initiatives. Take advantage of all those chances and usage them to consciously pattern being a leader.

* Achieve small victories- Some time back I started a short-lived sports tournament business. It failed disastrously. But I did learn many lessons out of that 'failure', if you can name it that. One that volition especially lodge with me is the impact that small triumphs may have got on my assurance levels. A cardinal portion of the business depended on raising sponsorship money to cover costs. It is definitely not an easy task, but when I raised my first $50, I felt I was capable of determination $100, and so on. That venture later 'failed', but Iodine have got nil to be ashamed of if just because I learned this lesson.

* Talk to yourself- I once thought that I was crazy because I talked to myself. I had these wild peppiness negotiation while I was alone in the car or in the shower. But I later establish out that many positive and confident people make this. It's a great manner to further a positive attitude. I experience that after having a solo peppiness talk, that 'fake' or 'built-up' confidence carries on to the street. It travels without saying that this should be a positive talk, not a negative one. It works either way.

* Act confident- Type A fluctuation of the 'solo peppiness talk' is to move confident. It have been proven that physical actions and emotions travel manus in hand. It was commonly believed that actions always follow emotions. But it is now accepted that your physical Acts have got an consequence in your emotional state. If you experience sad, smile. Maybe you experience eldritch at first, but that simple enactment may set you on your manner to a more than positive attitude. In the same way, if you experience uncertain about yourself, enactment as if you were confident. Stand up, set your shoulders back, smile, and talking authoritatively. You may start feeling truly self-confident in a while. Now, this maneuver shouldn't be used by itself, but when you don't have got any more than time to set up or practice, it is all you can do. And it works.

* trust YOURSELF- If you have got done everything that I described, there is absolutely no ground at all to experience down on yourself. Simply allow travel of all mental barriers and travel on with your mission!

By now the importance of self-confidence should be obvious. Bash you desire to project confidence? Bash you desire to derive a loyal following? Then you should start by gaining self-confidence. You should lead yourself so that you can lead others.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, May 12, 2007

Leadership - How To Maximize Your Potential As A Leader

Being a leader is never easy but if you are constantly learning and improving your skills as an individual and a leader you will have great success. Some say that great leaders are born. I'm not sure if that is true or not. What I do know is that great leaders do what is necessary to maximize their potential. Here are a few ways to help you maximize your potential as a leader as well.

1. Learn from everyone.

I have seen people that have achieved great levels of success as a leader but somewhere in their journey they stopped allowing themselves to learn from anyone. If you want to maximize your leadership skills never become so important that you can't learn something from the weakest person. Remember, just because you want to be a great leader doesn't mean that you are better than anyone, it just means you have more responsibility in serving others.

2. Learn from mentors.

This is one of the most important things that you can do. If you don't have a mentor you need to go find one as soon as possible. Mentors can help you achieve things in your life much faster. They can also give you the wisdom and foresight on things that you don't have a clue how to handle. All great leaders have had mentors in their life.

3. Empower others.

Great leaders know how to find untapped potential in people and then empower them to do things that will draw that potential out of them. Don't be intimidated if you find that someone on your team has more talent then you. Your goal as a leader is to empower the people to do their best for the betterment of the cause.

Labels: ,

Monday, May 07, 2007

Leadership #7 - Promote Cooperation and Trust in Your Team

Leaders have a problem - is the team really following you? Just because everyone seems to be moving in the same direction does not mean that everyone is on the same team! The Chinese has a very nice saying for this "Same bed, different dreams"

Of course, that saying originally pointed at broken marriages, but think of it in the context of your team. While not as tightly knit as a marriage, a team is nonetheless comprised of many individuals with their objectives and efforts intertwined.

As a leader, you need to build a high level of cooperation. The team must learn to work together. Most people are aware of this. Traditionally, when you work together, you do your work, and I do mine. You do your work well, and I do mine to perfection. Job well done. You, as a leader, do you think that everyone is working together in this scenario?

I would like to introduce another aspect to "working together" which is often ignored. When you are working together, you need to not only perform your tasks and execute your plans, but you should also keep an eye out for your team mates. See and call out if they make mistakes, extend a helping hand if they seem to have too full a plate; really, work TOGETHER. There is no better illustration of this than a team of climbers scaling a 100 feet rock wall. Sure, there is a leader. Of course each climber needs to be skilled and competent. Yet, at the core of it all, they make it up as a team. Can you do it solo? Most certainly, but then, you would not be much of a leader if no one can follow!

Cooperation, no matter how difficult it might appear to be, with varied personalities and conflicting objectives, is still easier to achieve than trust. The leader, to be a good leader, must understand this. One of the surest sign of good leadership is when team members trust you. But the sign of excellent leadership is when team members trust you AND each other. When you build a network of trust within the team, the entire team is all the stronger because of that.

As more support and cooperation comes into play, as more trust is built, a once mediocre team can soar to heights of excellence that would baffle more competent competitors. It is not how good you are, but how good the team is. Team performance rests a lot on good leadership. If nothing else, promote cooperation and trust in your team; it is more than half the way towards becoming a good leader.

In our next installment, we will be looking at how leaders can Share Power.

To catch up, here are my previous posts:


- Leadership #1: Articulate Your Personal Vision As a Leader


- Leadership #2: Putting Action To Your Words


- Leadership #3: Have a Vision


- Leadership #4: Share the Vision


- Leadership #5: Learn and Grow


- Leadership #6: Take Risks

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, April 16, 2007

Leadeship #2 - Putting Action Into Words

It is so easy to talk. After all, it's only words. Yet, these same words can come back and haunt you in the worse way. As a leader, this is a fact you need to be aware of. If you have shared your personal values as a leader, than the logical next step is to ensure that you make good on it.

From this, you will understand clearly that "sharing your personal values" is not just a cliche. It is not something that you "do" for your speeches. Your personal values should be exactly that - yours. Everyone have their beliefs, their likes and dislikes. Whether you choose to share them with others is your perogative. However, it would be most unwise to try to create a false persona by blithely listing some "values" that you think others would appreciate.

Action speaks louder than words, and in the case of a leader, those actions can solidify or destroy all the goodwill and trust that have been built.

Let us go for a safe example. Kindness. That is a character trait. Must be kind to animals, that could be a possible personal value. Now, if this is really not a value that you hold dear to your heart, don't say it. After a few beers, you go happily on your way, and then... you pat the dog, or you kick the cat? At a time when our guard is down, when we least expect it, our true values surfaces. It is bad enough to kick the cat, but there could be a million explanations and justifications. While that is bad, it is so much worse if you presented yourself as an animal lover, and then get caught in that despicable act. Kiss your leadership goodbye. You can still be "boss"; but you ain't git no respect!

It is important to articulate your personal values, it is even more important not to be dishonest in any way about them. Some people are not even sure what their personal values are, and so find it difficult to articulate them. But when you ACT, your values shine through. So, be careful what you say. Your words are a testimony more powerful than you know. Your actions then become the final straw that will either seal that truth or break the illusion you try to create.

On final point, some leaders try to "walk the talk". That is fine as long as the efforts are genuine. If you are building up new habits, if you are trying a new tact, fine. But never mis-represent that these are your already your values; your words, if not seen in action, mean nothing.

In the next installment, we will explore how a leader should "Have A Vision".

This is the second installment on Leadership. The first one, "Leadership - Articulate your Personal Values as a Leader" is also published here at http://www.ezinearticles.com/.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Leadership Success Principle – How To Get The Best Results In Everything That You Do

As a leader you will always be striving to get the best results in everything you do, but it's not always easy to accomplish. There can be many reasons why you don't always get the best results. But I want to share with you a success principle that will help you achieve your goals with the most success possible.

As a leader, you know that it can be very easy to get stuck into a routine of doing things they way they have always been done. As some people say, if it's not broke why fix it? However, we would never have the huge number of innovations that we have today if people like Henry Ford, Bill Gates, and Albert Einstein had thought like that. Even if you don't agree with everything that they have done, they all had one thing in common that has changed the way we live today. They all considered things in their next largest context.

Let me explain. Eliel Saarinen once said, 'Always design a thing by considering it in its next larger context -- a chair in a room, a room in a house, a house in an environment, an environment in a city plan.' You see, all of these people thought much larger than what they could see at the present moment. They saw how things applied in the next largest context.

As a leader, you have to use this success principle to be able to reach your highest levels of leadership success. How does the work that you do as a leader affect those that are closest to you? How does it affect the families of those working with you? How does it impact your town or community? How does it affect your country? How does it affect the world?

If you can answer these questions you will be able to do things in a way that will produce the best results for your short term and long term goals. Understand fully what you are doing as a leader, and how it affects people on all levels, and you will start getting better results with all of your efforts.

Labels: ,

Sunday, March 25, 2007

A Different Kind of Leader - Nu Leadership Series

"You must be the change you wish to see in the world."

Mohandas Gandhi

Too many managers want to carry a big stick and forget they are really on the same team as their employees. Twenty-first century organizations cannot afford managers who don't look at the big picture. For example, downsizing helps many companies in the short-term. However, sooner or later it hurts them if they don't analyze the long term consequences. In light of this reality, how do leaders decide whether to buy in on the newest management fads?

Let's focus on outsourcing as an example. Lisa Robinson Davis, management strategist, argues that before a company outsources, it needs to foster good relationships with workers if they want success. Handy, an organizational strategist, defines this relationship as another paradox. Workers want the most money while organizations want to pay the least. Outsourcing then becomes the management's solution to this matter.

However, without thinking strategically, an organization can be the loser over the long run. When managers initiate outsourcing without the concern of employees, they lose their employees' respect. Although some U.S. companies are concerned about the impact of outsourcing, others are not.

Outsourcing can become a relationship-breaker in the leader-follower relationship.
Clearly, credibility is an issue. Maxwell, author of Today Matters, argues that an individual's core values are the deeply held beliefs that authentically describe a person' soul. Kouzer and Posner, authors of Credibility, note that the majority of individuals admire leaders who are honest, inspiring, and competent.

Conversely, credibility of a leader is what drives employees to do more they than they are required to do for their jobs. In an age where ethics appear to be lowering, managers need to be caught doing the right thing. Therefore, integrity is important if an organization wants to implement a new business approach and convince employees to buy in.

References:

Braun, B. (2004). Offshore Outsourcing: Impact on the American Workplace, Braun Consulting News, 7(5).

Handy, C. (1997). The Age of Paradox. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Kouzes, J. & Posner, B. (2003). Credibility. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Maxwell, J. (2004). Today Matters. New York: Warner Faith.

© 2007 by Daryl D. Green

Labels: , , , ,